The original post concerned the savage murder of Samuel Paty in October 2020 for the ‘crime’ of showing cartoons in a History class. See Islamism is Fascism and Update. Six months later, this madness has spread to Batley in West Yorkshire where a teacher has been suspended and gone into hiding with police protection following death threats on (where else?) social media for the same ‘crime.’
I’d like to point out that these events are happening in Western Europe in the twenty-first century.
There have been demonstrations outside Batley Grammar School by a mob of religious dullards led by self-appointed ‘community leaders.’ The school has been forced to close only a few weeks after pupils returned following the Covid19 lockdowns. It is noticeable that all the demonstrators are men – many of them men in their twenties who are unlikely to have children at a secondary school. The police have shown remarkable restraint in not moving on nor arresting anyone involved in what is a clear breach of Covid regulations – a very different response to how they responded to the vigil for Sarah Everard. I’ve yet to see any complaints from the usual ‘feminists’ but it appears that not only do the rights of men who think they are women outweigh those of actual women (see Dark Thoughts and Feminism) but that the rights of followers of Islam trump the rights of everyone. And who on Earth has the time on a weekday to hang around a school for hours on end? Get a fucking job.
These events are yet more proof (if any was needed) that whatever religious people say, they do not want equality. What they want are special privileges for their own particular set of delusions. As Ricky Gervais has pointed out…
There is a long tradition of mocking religion in the West. I’ve shared numerous pictures, videos and quotes on this blog that mock Christianity. There is not a single right-on Guardian/BBC Establishment ‘journalist’ who would dare to defend the religion that has historically been the one followed by the majority of the population in the West. But the genius of the more fanatical followers of Islam – for genius it is – has been to equate criticism of Islam with racism. But what if I told you Muhammad of Mecca was racist? Here’s a Hadith I’ve used before…
(The Prophet said): “I am Muhammad bin ‘Abdullah bin ‘Abd al-Muttalib. Indeed, Allah created the creation and made me from the nest of them, and he then made them two groups (Arabs and non-Arabs) and made me from the best of them (the Arabs), then He made me the tribes and made me from the best tribe, then he made houses and made me from the best house. So I am the best house among them, and I am the best person among them.” [My emphasis]
Many of Muhammad’s most prominent followers are also racists. My most popular post to date – Quote of the Day #59 – was from Muhammad Al-Arifi…
“Arabs are the true Muslims and the true descendants of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh)…Non-Arabs who without shame, call themselves Muslims are just plain Converts whom are lowly Cowards with unhonourable souls. That were overwhelmed with ease by the Swords of Allah, thus they deserved to be called as our Dogs.”
I’d like to set readers a task. Try doing a search for what colour Muhammad was. Islamic sources invariably refer to him as a “white man.” If you choose to go further, you can find Islamic sources that report that Muhammad bought, sold and owned slaves and described black Africans as “raisin heads.” I wonder what the identity warriors would make of that one.
One of the most annoying phrases of our times, usually used by racist ‘academics’ or ‘journalists,’ is ‘educate yourself.’ By this they actually mean ‘read the books I have read, think the thoughts I think.’ Well perhaps some people need to educate themselves about Islam by reading this book…
I have made the point before that the Koran is an extremely difficult book to read. It took me about four months to get through because I could only mange three or four pages at a time. I’d say that two-thirds of the Koran is pure gibberish and much of the rest expresses violent hatred of outsiders and nonbelievers. Muslims claim that this book is the perfect, eternal and uncreated word of the Creator of the Universe. So how do they explain Sura (chapter) 66? It only has 12 ayats (verses) and is worth quoting in full…
“O Prophet! Why bannest thou that which Allah hath made lawful for thee, seeking to please thy wives? And Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. [2] Allah hath made lawful for you (Muslims) absolution from your oaths (of such a kind), and Allah is your Protector. He is the Knower, the Wise. [3] When the Prophet confided a fact unto one of his wives and when she afterward divulged it and Allah apprised him thereof, he made known (to her) part thereof and passed over part. And when he told it her she said: Who hath told thee? He said: The Knower, the Aware hath told me. [4] If ye twain turn unto Allah repentant, (ye have cause to do so) for your hearts desired (the ban); and if ye aid one another against him (Muhammad) then lo! Allah, even He, is his Protecting Friend, and Gabriel and the righteous among the believers; and furthermore the angels are his helpers. [5] It may happen that his Lord, if he divorce you, will give him in your stead wives better than you, submissive (to Allah), believing, pious, penitent, devout, inclined to fasting, widows and maids. [6] O ye who believe! Ward off from yourselves and your families a Fire whereof the fuel is men and stones, over which are set angels strong, severe, who resist not Allah in that which He commandeth them, but do that which they are commanded. [7] (Then it will be said): O ye who disbelieve! Make no excuses for yourselves this day. Ye are only being paid for what ye used to do. [8] O ye who believe! Turn unto Allah in sincere repentance! It may be that your Lord will remit from you your evil deeds and bring you into Gardens underneath which rivers flow, on the day when Allah will not abase the Prophet and those who believe with him. Their light will run before them and on their right hands; they will say: Our Lord! Perfect our light for us, and forgive us! Lo! Thou art Able to do all things. [9] O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey’s end. [10] Allah citeth an example for those who disbelieve: the wife of Noah and the wife of Lot, who were under two of Our righteous slaves yet betrayed them so that they (the husbands) availed them naught against Allah and it was said (unto them): Enter the Fire along with those who enter. [11] And Allah citeth an example for those who believe: the wife of Pharaoh when she said: My Lord! Build for me a home with thee in the Garden, and deliver me from Pharaoh and his work, and deliver me from evil-doing folk; [12] And Mary, daughter of ‘Imran, whose body was chaste, therefor We breathed therein something of Our Spirit. And she put faith in the words of her Lord and His scriptures, and was of the obedient.”
Why does the eternal word of ‘god’ contain details of Muhammad’s sex life? And doesn’t verse 3 suggest that this particular ‘revelation’ was rather convenient to Muhammad and that one of his wives called him out on it? Of course, as verse 9 shows, no chapter of the Koran is complete without the obligatory hatred of unbelievers. This whole chapter reeks of misogyny – very strange considering Muhammad is considered a ‘feminist’ by some people who clearly know nothing of his life and teachings. Ho hum.
I’d like to end by returning to how Islamists and their apologists in the media/political class dislike cartoons so much that they are prepared to kill and/or defend killing people who dare to draw or show cartoons. So here’s one I drew earlier…
Mike's Place 